micro--go-micro
Codex
8a356f67fa
govulncheck / govulncheck (push) Has been cancelled
Harness (E2E) / Harnesses (mock LLM) (push) Has been cancelled
Harness (E2E) / Provider harnesses (live LLM conformance) (push) Has been cancelled
Lint / golangci-lint (push) Has been cancelled
Run Tests / Unit Tests (push) Has been cancelled
Run Tests / Etcd Integration Tests (push) Has been cancelled
28 行
1.7 KiB
Markdown
28 行
1.7 KiB
Markdown
# Priorities
|
|
|
|
The ranked work queue for the autonomous improvement loop. The
|
|
**architecture-review** pass (the *architect*) owns this file: each run it turns
|
|
the [roadmap](../../ROADMAP.md) plus an internal scan (gaps in the
|
|
services → agents → workflows lifecycle, API coherence, drift, tech debt, test and
|
|
DX friction) into a single ordered list — highest-value first — and links each
|
|
item to a tracking issue. The hourly **continuous-improvement** pass works the
|
|
**top item whose issue is still open**. So the architect decides *what*, and the
|
|
increment loop *builds* it.
|
|
|
|
**Reading / editing.** An item is done when its linked issue closes (the increment
|
|
that builds it adds `Closes #<issue>`). Roadmap phase (Now → Next → Later) is the
|
|
primary ordering; internal findings are interleaved by value, not kept in a
|
|
separate list. The human can reorder this list — or the issues — at any time to
|
|
redirect the loop; direction always wins.
|
|
|
|
**Off-limits to the loop** (the architect proposes these as notes, never as queue
|
|
items the loop can auto-merge): brand/positioning copy, breaking public-API
|
|
changes, architectural rewrites. Those go to the human.
|
|
|
|
## Work queue (ranked)
|
|
|
|
1. **Add agent-level x402 spend budget guardrail** ([#4743](https://github.com/micro/go-micro/issues/4743)) — #4741 closed the streaming chat/A2A conformance item, and there are no open codex PRs in flight. The next highest-value user-facing gap is making paid tool calls safe for unattended agents: an explicit per-run spend cap beside `MaxSteps` and `ApproveTool`, deterministic in-process coverage, and inspectable refusals when the budget would be exceeded.
|
|
|
|
_Seeded by Claude Code from the roadmap + open issues; thereafter maintained by the
|
|
architecture-review pass._
|