micro--go-micro
Codex
70f8d1f92c
Harness (E2E) / Harnesses (mock LLM) (push) Has been cancelled
Harness (E2E) / Provider harnesses (live LLM conformance) (push) Has been cancelled
Lint / golangci-lint (push) Has been cancelled
Run Tests / Unit Tests (push) Has been cancelled
Run Tests / Etcd Integration Tests (push) Has been cancelled
30 行
2.6 KiB
Markdown
30 行
2.6 KiB
Markdown
# Priorities
|
|
|
|
The ranked work queue for the autonomous improvement loop. The
|
|
**architecture-review** pass (the *architect*) owns this file: each run it turns
|
|
the [roadmap](../../ROADMAP.md) plus an internal scan (gaps in the
|
|
services → agents → workflows lifecycle, API coherence, drift, tech debt, test and
|
|
DX friction) into a single ordered list — highest-value first — and links each
|
|
item to a tracking issue. The hourly **continuous-improvement** pass works the
|
|
**top item whose issue is still open**. So the architect decides *what*, and the
|
|
increment loop *builds* it.
|
|
|
|
**Reading / editing.** An item is done when its linked issue closes (the increment
|
|
that builds it adds `Closes #<issue>`). Roadmap phase (Now → Next → Later) is the
|
|
primary ordering; internal findings are interleaved by value, not kept in a
|
|
separate list. The human can reorder this list — or the issues — at any time to
|
|
redirect the loop; direction always wins.
|
|
|
|
**Off-limits to the loop** (the architect proposes these as notes, never as queue
|
|
items the loop can auto-merge): brand/positioning copy, breaking public-API
|
|
changes, architectural rewrites. Those go to the human.
|
|
|
|
## Work queue (ranked)
|
|
|
|
1. **Verify installed first-agent on-ramp commands** ([#4197](https://github.com/micro/go-micro/issues/4197)) — developer adoption is the current goal, and the canonical story in the README, website, and recent blog posts depends on a provider-free path that works from the installed CLI. Keep `micro agent demo`, `micro examples`, `micro zero-to-hero`, first-agent docs, debugging, and 0→hero wayfinding aligned and CI-verifiable so 0→1 does not regress while hardening continues.
|
|
2. **Propagate cancellation and retry signals through provider model calls** ([#4175](https://github.com/micro/go-micro/issues/4175)) — with the AtlasCloud exact-once delegate/notify seam closed by #4200, the remaining Now-phase reliability gap is failure handling under real provider conditions: cancellation/deadline propagation and retry/backoff must not duplicate tool side effects. This keeps the services → agents → workflows lifecycle dependable across providers without changing public APIs.
|
|
3. **Resume durable agent runs from checkpoints** ([#4202](https://github.com/micro/go-micro/issues/4202)) — once the installed on-ramp and provider failure semantics are guarded, move into the Next-phase durable-agent-loop work: long-running agents should recover like flows, checkpoint progress, and avoid replaying completed tool side effects after interruption.
|
|
|
|
_Seeded by Claude Code from the roadmap + open issues; thereafter maintained by the
|
|
architecture-review pass._
|