micro--go-micro
9d6d2d6c91
Co-authored-by: Codex <codex@openai.com>
29 行
2.1 KiB
Markdown
29 行
2.1 KiB
Markdown
# Priorities
|
|
|
|
The ranked work queue for the autonomous improvement loop. The
|
|
**architecture-review** pass (the *architect*) owns this file: each run it turns
|
|
the [roadmap](../../ROADMAP.md) plus an internal scan (gaps in the
|
|
services → agents → workflows lifecycle, API coherence, drift, tech debt, test and
|
|
DX friction) into a single ordered list — highest-value first — and links each
|
|
item to a tracking issue. The hourly **continuous-improvement** pass works the
|
|
**top item whose issue is still open**. So the architect decides *what*, and the
|
|
increment loop *builds* it.
|
|
|
|
**Reading / editing.** An item is done when its linked issue closes (the increment
|
|
that builds it adds `Closes #<issue>`). Roadmap phase (Now → Next → Later) is the
|
|
primary ordering; internal findings are interleaved by value, not kept in a
|
|
separate list. The human can reorder this list — or the issues — at any time to
|
|
redirect the loop; direction always wins.
|
|
|
|
**Off-limits to the loop** (the architect proposes these as notes, never as queue
|
|
items the loop can auto-merge): brand/positioning copy, breaking public-API
|
|
changes, architectural rewrites. Those go to the human.
|
|
|
|
## Work queue (ranked)
|
|
|
|
1. **CI-verify the getting-started 0→1 and 0→hero contract** ([#4428](https://github.com/micro/go-micro/issues/4428)) — Developer adoption is the current goal, and the README/website promise scaffold → run → call plus a no-secret services → agents → workflows path. Keep that on-ramp as a CI-verifiable contract with clear failure boundaries so first-agent success stays weighted alongside harness depth.
|
|
2. **Handle AtlasCloud plan-delegate partial tool calls** ([#4431](https://github.com/micro/go-micro/issues/4431)) — Recent live conformance showed AtlasCloud/minimax can stop at a partial XML-style tool call, leaving delegation without the required task/notify side effects. Fix this focused provider/tool-call seam next so cross-provider hardening covers the services → agents → workflows loop without masking failed delegation as success.
|
|
|
|
_Seeded by Claude Code from the roadmap + open issues; thereafter maintained by the
|
|
architecture-review pass._
|