micro--go-micro
Codex
e501fc732c
Harness (E2E) / Harnesses (mock LLM) (push) Has been cancelled
Harness (E2E) / Provider harnesses (live LLM conformance) (push) Has been cancelled
Lint / golangci-lint (push) Has been cancelled
Run Tests / Unit Tests (push) Has been cancelled
Run Tests / Etcd Integration Tests (push) Has been cancelled
28 行
2.0 KiB
Markdown
28 行
2.0 KiB
Markdown
# Priorities
|
|
|
|
The ranked work queue for the autonomous improvement loop. The
|
|
**architecture-review** pass (the *architect*) owns this file: each run it turns
|
|
the [roadmap](../../ROADMAP.md) plus an internal scan (gaps in the
|
|
services → agents → workflows lifecycle, API coherence, drift, tech debt, test and
|
|
DX friction) into a single ordered list — highest-value first — and links each
|
|
item to a tracking issue. The hourly **continuous-improvement** pass works the
|
|
**top item whose issue is still open**. So the architect decides *what*, and the
|
|
increment loop *builds* it.
|
|
|
|
**Reading / editing.** An item is done when its linked issue closes (the increment
|
|
that builds it adds `Closes #<issue>`). Roadmap phase (Now → Next → Later) is the
|
|
primary ordering; internal findings are interleaved by value, not kept in a
|
|
separate list. The human can reorder this list — or the issues — at any time to
|
|
redirect the loop; direction always wins.
|
|
|
|
**Off-limits to the loop** (the architect proposes these as notes, never as queue
|
|
items the loop can auto-merge): brand/positioning copy, breaking public-API
|
|
changes, architectural rewrites. Those go to the human.
|
|
|
|
## Work queue (ranked)
|
|
|
|
1. **Make long agent runs resumable from checkpoints** ([#3449](https://github.com/micro/go-micro/issues/3449)) — the flow grader loop shipped in #3443 and the run-trace analyzer shipped in #3447, closing the previous top queue item (#3439). With flow durability and optimization now proving the workflow side, the highest-value remaining lifecycle seam is agent-run durability: long agent loops should persist enough progress to resume without replaying completed tool side effects. This aligns the services → agents → workflows runtime by giving agents the same operable recovery posture that flows already have, while staying scoped to a non-breaking, CI-verifiable checkpoint/resume contract.
|
|
|
|
_Seeded by Claude Code from the roadmap + open issues; thereafter maintained by the
|
|
architecture-review pass._
|