# Review Tracing Protocol ## Purpose Save full prompt/response pairs for every cross-model reviewer call, enabling: - **Reviewer-independence audit**: verify the executor only passed file paths, not summaries - **Reproducibility**: threadId preservation allows conversation continuation - **Meta-optimize input**: richer data for harness improvement analysis ## When to Trace After **every** `mcp__codex__codex` or `mcp__codex__codex-reply` call that serves a reviewer/critique function. This includes review scoring, experiment auditing, claim verification, idea critique, and patch gating. Do NOT trace: purely informational LLM calls (e.g., `codex exec` for code generation that is not a review). ## Trace Directory ``` .aris/traces//_run/ ├── run.meta.json # Run-level metadata ├── 001-.request.json # Request snapshot ├── 001-.response.md # Full response text ├── 001-.meta.json # Response metadata ├── 002-.request.json # Second call (e.g., reply) └── ... ``` - ``: the ARIS skill that triggered this call (e.g., `auto-review-loop`) - `_run`: date + sequential run number (start from `01`) - ``: short kebab-case label (e.g., `round-1-review`, `critique`, `ideation`, `audit`, `patch-gate`) ## How to Trace After each reviewer MCP call — including every FAILED attempt in a capability-fallback chain (one trace entry per attempt: `--status error` + `--fallback-reason`; the successful entry records the RESOLVED pair) — save the trace using `save_trace.sh`, resolved through the canonical helper chain (see `integration-contract.md` §2 — failure policy C, "forensic helper"). The full invocation: ```bash # Resolve $TRACE_HELPER (canonical strict-safe chain; see integration-contract.md §2). cd "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)" || exit 1 if [ -z "${ARIS_REPO:-}" ] && [ -f .aris/installed-skills.txt ]; then ARIS_REPO=$(awk -F'\t' '$1=="repo_root"{print $2; exit}' .aris/installed-skills.txt 2>/dev/null) || true fi TRACE_HELPER=".aris/tools/save_trace.sh" [ -f "$TRACE_HELPER" ] || TRACE_HELPER="tools/save_trace.sh" [ -f "$TRACE_HELPER" ] || { [ -n "${ARIS_REPO:-}" ] && TRACE_HELPER="$ARIS_REPO/tools/save_trace.sh"; } [ -f "$TRACE_HELPER" ] || TRACE_HELPER="" if [ -n "$TRACE_HELPER" ]; then bash "$TRACE_HELPER" \ --skill "" \ --purpose "" \ --model "" \ --effort "" \ --fallback-reason "" \ --status "" \ --thread-id "" \ --prompt "" \ --response "" else # Required fallback: the resolver exhausted all three layers and # save_trace.sh is unreachable, but trace artifacts are still # required (unless `--- trace: off` was explicitly set on this # SKILL invocation). Write the four files below directly per the # schemas in "File Schemas", into: # .aris/traces//_run/ # run.meta.json # -.request.json # -.response.md # -.meta.json # Do NOT silently skip — trace_path is load-bearing for any # mandatory audit emitting `trace_path` in its artifact (see # assurance-contract.md §"Required Audit Artifact Schema"). echo "WARN: save_trace.sh not resolved; writing trace files directly per review-tracing.md schema." >&2 fi ``` The helper, when present, handles directory creation, run numbering, and file writing. The fallback branch above documents what to do when the helper is unreachable — the trace is forensic evidence, so "helper missing" never means "skip the trace." ## File Schemas ### `run.meta.json` ```json { "skill": "auto-review-loop", "run_id": "2026-04-15_run01", "started_at": "2026-04-15T14:30:00+08:00", "executor": "claude-code", "project_dir": "/path/to/project" } ``` ### `NNN-.request.json` ```json { "call_number": 1, "purpose": "round-1-review", "timestamp": "2026-04-15T14:31:00+08:00", "tool": "mcp__codex__codex", "model": "gpt-5.6-sol", "config": {"model_reasoning_effort": "xhigh"}, "files_referenced": ["paper/sections/3_method.tex", "results/table1.csv"], "prompt": "" } ``` ### `NNN-.response.md` The reviewer's full response, verbatim. No truncation, no summarization. ### `NNN-.meta.json` ```json { "call_number": 1, "purpose": "round-1-review", "timestamp": "2026-04-15T14:33:00+08:00", "thread_id": "019d8fe0-b25d-...", "model": "gpt-5.6-sol", "duration_ms": 142000, "status": "ok" } ``` ## Configuration Tracing respects three modes, set via inline parameter `--- trace: off | meta | full`: - **`full`** (default): save full prompt + full response - **`meta`**: save metadata only (no prompt/response text), useful for sensitive projects - **`off`**: disable tracing entirely ## Integration with events.jsonl After writing a trace, append a compact summary event to `.aris/meta/events.jsonl`: ```json {"event":"review_trace","skill":"auto-review-loop","purpose":"round-1-review","thread_id":"...","trace_path":".aris/traces/auto-review-loop/2026-04-15_run01/","status":"ok"} ``` This allows `/meta-optimize` to discover traces without reading the full trace files. ## Debugging With Traces Traces are not only audit evidence — they are the **first place to look when a verdict is surprising**: a score regresses round-to-round, two reviewer backends disagree, or `/result-to-claim` contradicts an earlier claim. Before re-invoking the reviewer for "a better answer", read the raw transcript and find the moment its judgment actually changed: ```bash # Diff the raw response bodies across the two calls in question skill=auto-review-loop run=2026-04-15_run01 diff ".aris/traces/$skill/$run/002-round-2.response.md" \ ".aris/traces/$skill/$run/003-round-3.response.md" # Grep for the sentence where the assessment turned grep -En 'however|but|concern|missing|cannot' \ ".aris/traces/$skill/$run/003-round-3.response.md" ``` The paragraph where the assessment changed **is** the causal explanation for the divergence — cite it, don't guess. Re-running the reviewer without reading the trace is tuning by vibe: you get a new opinion, not an explanation. This is the same muscle ARIS already applies to code failures (the "**Read the error** — parse traceback, stderr, and log files" step in `/experiment-bridge`'s auto-debug sequence, and `/codex:rescue` reading tracebacks before a retry) — applied to saved AI-judgment transcripts instead of stderr. The trace is written in English and most of it is the reviewer talking to itself; the discipline is identical: read the primary artifact first, then act on the exact divergence point rather than re-rolling the dice. Practical triggers: | Surprise | Trace move | |---|---| | Score dropped after a "fix" round | diff the two rounds' `.response.md`; find which criterion flipped | | Two backends disagree (codex vs gemini/manual) | grep both responses for the SAME artifact path; compare what each actually read | | Reviewer "forgot" an earlier concern | grep prior rounds for the concern keyword; if present-then-absent, cite it in the next prompt instead of restating from memory | | Verdict contradicts a deterministic checker | read the request `.md` — was the checker's output actually in the files the reviewer was pointed at? | ## Privacy - `.aris/traces/` should be in `.gitignore` — traces are project-local, never committed - Traces may contain sensitive research content; treat them as confidential - Use `--- trace: off` for projects with strict confidentiality requirements