项目文件夹

文件
Asim Aslam 4311b73361 Enhance ADK vs Go Micro comparison and apply lint fixes (#2994)
* docs: compare Go Micro with Google ADK in the comparison guide

Adds a 'vs Agent Frameworks (Google ADK)' section: ADK builds an agent,
Go Micro builds the distributed system the agent lives in (agents are
services in the mesh). Covers the category difference, a feature table,
when to choose each, and MCP/A2A interoperability.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CmdEY7pYmV5zzwCjNJ4ykL

* docs: replace ADK comparison slogan with concrete explanation

State plainly what each tool provides (ADK builds an agent process; Go Micro
builds the surrounding service mesh) instead of marketing phrasing.

* lint: apply golangci-lint autofixes; exclude ST1003 and demo errcheck

Mechanical, behaviour-preserving fixes applied by 'golangci-lint run --fix':
gofmt, misspell (US spelling), usestdlibvars (http.Method*/Status*), unconvert,
and the auto-fixable staticcheck simplifications (QF*, S1017/S1019/S1023/S1039).

Config: exclude ST1003 (remaining offenders are exported API renames, e.g.
web.Id, which would break compatibility) and skip errcheck for examples/ and
internal/harness/ (demo code where fire-and-forget is intentional).

Build and test compilation verified.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CmdEY7pYmV5zzwCjNJ4ykL

* lint: WIP cleanup checkpoint (errcheck config + partial fixes)

Checkpoint of an in-progress golangci-lint cleanup (background pass). Builds
cleanly; lint is not yet zero. Follow-up commit will complete the cleanup and
switch CI to a blocking full-tree lint.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CmdEY7pYmV5zzwCjNJ4ykL

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-22 17:21:47 +01:00

48 行
1.3 KiB
Go

package events
import (
"testing"
"github.com/google/uuid"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
)
func TestStore(t *testing.T) {
store := NewStore()
testData := []Event{
{ID: uuid.New().String(), Topic: "foo"},
{ID: uuid.New().String(), Topic: "foo"},
{ID: uuid.New().String(), Topic: "bar"},
}
// write the records to the store
t.Run("Write", func(t *testing.T) {
for _, event := range testData {
err := store.Write(&event)
assert.Nilf(t, err, "Writing an event should not return an error")
}
})
// should not be able to read events from a blank topic
t.Run("ReadMissingTopic", func(t *testing.T) {
evs, err := store.Read("")
assert.Equal(t, err, ErrMissingTopic, "Reading a blank topic should return an error")
assert.Nil(t, evs, "No events should be returned")
})
// should only get the events from the topic requested
t.Run("ReadTopic", func(t *testing.T) {
evs, err := store.Read("foo")
assert.Nilf(t, err, "No error should be returned")
assert.Len(t, evs, 2, "Only the events for this topic should be returned")
})
// limits should be honored
t.Run("ReadTopicLimit", func(t *testing.T) {
evs, err := store.Read("foo", ReadLimit(1))
assert.Nilf(t, err, "No error should be returned")
assert.Len(t, evs, 1, "The result should include no more than the read limit")
})
}