项目文件夹

文件
Asim Aslam c80d0c62d8 Refresh planner queue for 4695 (#4697)
Co-authored-by: Codex <codex@openai.com>
2026-07-11 13:30:12 +01:00

2.4 KiB

Priorities

The ranked work queue for the autonomous improvement loop. The architecture-review pass (the architect) owns this file: each run it turns the roadmap plus an internal scan (gaps in the services → agents → workflows lifecycle, API coherence, drift, tech debt, test and DX friction) into a single ordered list — highest-value first — and links each item to a tracking issue. The hourly continuous-improvement pass works the top item whose issue is still open. So the architect decides what, and the increment loop builds it.

Reading / editing. An item is done when its linked issue closes (the increment that builds it adds Closes #<issue>). Roadmap phase (Now → Next → Later) is the primary ordering; internal findings are interleaved by value, not kept in a separate list. The human can reorder this list — or the issues — at any time to redirect the loop; direction always wins.

Off-limits to the loop (the architect proposes these as notes, never as queue items the loop can auto-merge): brand/positioning copy, breaking public-API changes, architectural rewrites. Those go to the human.

Work queue (ranked)

  1. Harden agent provider failure resilience (#4650) — With scheduled cross-provider conformance closed by #4678, the first-agent fixture races closed by #4684/#4667, Nack redelivery fixed by #4694, and initial provider failure metadata recorded by #4688, the next Now-roadmap reliability seam is making timeouts, cancellation, rate limits, retry/backoff, and inspectable failure metadata predictable through the agent loop. Keep this scoped to existing behavior and tests; surface any breaking API or default changes as human review notes instead of queue work.
  2. Verify first-agent docs commands in CI (#4696) — The North Star says developer adoption is the current goal, and the README now offers a long walkable path (micro agent demo, quickcheck/debug, examples, zero-to-hero, docs, and no-secret examples). Turn those breadcrumbs into a focused no-secret command/documentation contract so the 0→1 and 0→hero on-ramp stays runnable instead of becoming aspirational copy while internal hardening continues.

Seeded by Claude Code from the roadmap + open issues; thereafter maintained by the architecture-review pass.