项目文件夹

文件
Asim Aslam 4311b73361 Enhance ADK vs Go Micro comparison and apply lint fixes (#2994)
* docs: compare Go Micro with Google ADK in the comparison guide

Adds a 'vs Agent Frameworks (Google ADK)' section: ADK builds an agent,
Go Micro builds the distributed system the agent lives in (agents are
services in the mesh). Covers the category difference, a feature table,
when to choose each, and MCP/A2A interoperability.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CmdEY7pYmV5zzwCjNJ4ykL

* docs: replace ADK comparison slogan with concrete explanation

State plainly what each tool provides (ADK builds an agent process; Go Micro
builds the surrounding service mesh) instead of marketing phrasing.

* lint: apply golangci-lint autofixes; exclude ST1003 and demo errcheck

Mechanical, behaviour-preserving fixes applied by 'golangci-lint run --fix':
gofmt, misspell (US spelling), usestdlibvars (http.Method*/Status*), unconvert,
and the auto-fixable staticcheck simplifications (QF*, S1017/S1019/S1023/S1039).

Config: exclude ST1003 (remaining offenders are exported API renames, e.g.
web.Id, which would break compatibility) and skip errcheck for examples/ and
internal/harness/ (demo code where fire-and-forget is intentional).

Build and test compilation verified.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CmdEY7pYmV5zzwCjNJ4ykL

* lint: WIP cleanup checkpoint (errcheck config + partial fixes)

Checkpoint of an in-progress golangci-lint cleanup (background pass). Builds
cleanly; lint is not yet zero. Follow-up commit will complete the cleanup and
switch CI to a blocking full-tree lint.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CmdEY7pYmV5zzwCjNJ4ykL

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-22 17:21:47 +01:00

80 行
1.8 KiB
Go

package mcp
import (
"reflect"
"testing"
)
func TestParseTool(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
toolName string
want []string
}{
{
name: "simple two-part tool",
toolName: "service.endpoint",
want: []string{"service", "endpoint"},
},
{
name: "three-part tool (service.Handler.Method)",
toolName: "greeter.Greeter.Hello",
want: []string{"greeter", "Greeter", "Hello"},
},
{
name: "single part (invalid)",
toolName: "service",
want: []string{"service"},
},
{
name: "four-part tool",
toolName: "users.Users.Get.All",
want: []string{"users", "Users", "Get", "All"},
},
{
name: "empty string",
toolName: "",
want: []string{""},
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := parseTool(tt.toolName)
if !reflect.DeepEqual(got, tt.want) {
t.Errorf("parseTool(%q) = %v, want %v", tt.toolName, got, tt.want)
}
})
}
}
func TestExportFormats(t *testing.T) {
// Test that export formats are recognized
formats := []string{"langchain", "openapi", "json"}
for _, format := range formats {
t.Run(format, func(t *testing.T) {
// This is a basic test to ensure the format strings are defined
// The actual export functions are tested through integration tests
if format == "" {
t.Error("export format should not be empty")
}
})
}
}
func TestDocsFormats(t *testing.T) {
// Test that docs formats are recognized
formats := []string{"markdown", "json"}
for _, format := range formats {
t.Run(format, func(t *testing.T) {
// This is a basic test to ensure the format strings are defined
// The actual docs functions are tested through integration tests
if format == "" {
t.Error("docs format should not be empty")
}
})
}
}