The framework's depth is strong but the on-ramp is the adoption gap, and the
architect queue had filled entirely with internal hardening. Steer the
architect to weight the developer on-ramp/DX (first-agent tutorial,
discoverable examples, docs wayfinding, install friction, debugging) at least
as highly as internal work — a developer succeeding on their first agent
matters more than another conformance/observability increment. Adoption issues
filed: #3561-#3565.
Also add loop-release.yml: a daily patch release that tags v6.MINOR.PATCH+1
when master has new commits (pushed with the PAT so goreleaser fires), so the
installable framework tracks the loop's daily improvements instead of lapsing.
Minor/major bumps stay with the human.
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Rename the autonomous-loop workflows so the Actions list maps to the
long-running-agent harness pattern (planner → generator → evaluator):
architecture-review.yml -> loop-architect.yml "Loop: Architect (Planner)"
continuous-improvement.yml -> loop-builder.yml "Loop: Builder (Generator)"
devrel-review.yml -> loop-devrel.yml "Loop: DevRel"
harness-triage.yml -> loop-triage.yml "Loop: Triage (Evaluator feedback)"
harness.yml stays the shared Evaluator/CI gate (triage still matches it by the
"Harness (E2E)" name). Document the pipeline + role mapping in
CONTINUOUS_IMPROVEMENT.md, and point to it from CONTRIBUTING so the development
process is discoverable. No behavior change — schedules, gates, and required
checks are unaffected.
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Close the loop's feedback path: when the live provider-conformance harness
fails, harness-triage.yml dispatches Codex to triage the failing run — read
logs, root-cause, dedupe against open issues, and file scoped codex/enhancement
issues that the hourly increment loop then fixes and the next harness run
verifies. Transient flakes are ignored; breaking/architectural fixes are
escalated as needs-human rather than auto-built. No human in the middle short
of a genuine judgment call. Documented in CONTINUOUS_IMPROVEMENT.md.
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add the verification loop as a ranked priority — the one missing layer from
the four-loop framing (agent / verification / event-driven / hill-climbing):
flow.Verify + flow.LLMGrader to grade a step's output against a rubric and
retry with feedback. The architect will re-rank on its next pass.
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Queue the Next-phase agent streaming item and the a2a multi-skill gap that
block a real consumer from retiring its bespoke planner / A2A handler. The
architecture-review pass re-ranks from here.
Asim Aslam