* refactor graph conv * docs & tests * fix lint * fix lint * fix lint * fix lint script * fix lint * Update * Style fix * Fix style * Fix style * Fix gpu case * Fix for gpu case * Hotfix edgesoftmax docs * Handle repeated features * Add docstring * Set default arguments * Remove dropout from nn.conv * Fix * add util fn for renaming * revert gcn_spmv.py * mx folder * fix wierd bug * fix mx * fix lint
Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN)
Paper link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02907 Author's code repo: https://github.com/tkipf/gcn
Dependencies
- MXNet nightly build
- requests
bash pip install mxnet --pre pip install requests
Codes
The folder contains three implementations of GCN:
gcn.pyuses DGL's predefined graph convolution module.gcn_mp.pyuses user-defined message and reduce functions.gcn_spmv.pyimproves fromgcn_mp.pyby using DGL's builtin functions so SPMV optimization could be applied.
The provided implementation in gcn_concat.py is a bit different from the
original paper for better performance, credit to @yifeim and @ZiyueHuang.
Results
Run with following (available dataset: "cora", "citeseer", "pubmed")
DGLBACKEND=mxnet python3 train.py --dataset cora --gpu 0
- cora: ~0.810 (paper: 0.815)
- citeseer: ~0.702 (paper: 0.703)
- pubmed: ~0.780 (paper: 0.790)
Results (gcn_concat.py vs. gcn.py)
gcn_concat.py uses concatenation of hidden units to account for multi-hop
skip-connections, while gcn_spmv.py uses simple additions (the original paper
omitted this detail). We feel concatenation is superior
because all neighboring information is presented without additional modeling
assumptions.
These results are based on single-run training to minimize the cross-entropy
loss. We can see clear skip connection can help train a GCN with many layers.
The experiments show that adding depth may or may not improve accuracy. While adding depth is a clear way to mimic power iterations of matrix factorizations, training multiple epochs to obtain stationary points could equivalently solve matrix factorization. Given the small datasets, we can't draw such conclusions from these experiments.
# Final accuracy 57.70% MLP without GCN
DGLBACKEND=mxnet python3 examples/mxnet/gcn/gcn_concat.py --dataset "citeseer" --n-epochs 200 --n-layers 0
# Final accuracy 68.20% with 2-layer GCN
DGLBACKEND=mxnet python3 examples/mxnet/gcn/gcn_spmv.py --dataset "citeseer" --n-epochs 200 --n-layers 1
# Final accuracy 18.40% with 10-layer GCN
DGLBACKEND=mxnet python3 examples/mxnet/gcn/gcn_spmv.py --dataset "citeseer" --n-epochs 200 --n-layers 9
# Final accuracy 65.70% with 10-layer GCN with skip connection
DGLBACKEND=mxnet python3 examples/mxnet/gcn/gcn_concat.py --dataset "citeseer" --n-epochs 200 --n-layers 2 --normalization 'sym' --self-loop
# Final accuracy 64.70% with 10-layer GCN with skip connection
DGLBACKEND=mxnet python3 examples/mxnet/gcn/gcn_concat.py --dataset "citeseer" --n-epochs 200 --n-layers 10 --normalization 'sym' --self-loop
# Final accuracy 53.20% MLP without GCN
DGLBACKEND=mxnet python3 examples/mxnet/gcn/gcn_concat.py --dataset "cora" --n-epochs 200 --n-layers 0
# Final accuracy 81.40% with 2-layer GCN
DGLBACKEND=mxnet python3 examples/mxnet/gcn/gcn_spmv.py --dataset "cora" --n-epochs 200 --n-layers 1
# Final accuracy 27.60% with 10-layer GCN
DGLBACKEND=mxnet python3 examples/mxnet/gcn/gcn_spmv.py --dataset "cora" --n-epochs 200 --n-layers 9
# Final accuracy 72.60% with 2-layer GCN with skip connection
DGLBACKEND=mxnet python3 examples/mxnet/gcn/gcn_concat.py --dataset "cora" --n-epochs 200 --n-layers 2 --normalization 'sym' --self-loop
# Final accuracy 78.90% with 10-layer GCN with skip connection
DGLBACKEND=mxnet python3 examples/mxnet/gcn/gcn_concat.py --dataset "cora" --n-epochs 200 --n-layers 10 --normalization 'sym' --self-loop
# Final accuracy 70.30% MLP without GCN
DGLBACKEND=mxnet python3 examples/mxnet/gcn/gcn_concat.py --dataset "pubmed" --n-epochs 200 --n-layers 0
# Final accuracy 77.40% with 2-layer GCN
DGLBACKEND=mxnet python3 examples/mxnet/gcn/gcn_spmv.py --dataset "pubmed" --n-epochs 200 --n-layers 1
# Final accuracy 36.20% with 10-layer GCN
DGLBACKEND=mxnet python3 examples/mxnet/gcn/gcn_spmv.py --dataset "pubmed" --n-epochs 200 --n-layers 9
# Final accuracy 78.30% with 2-layer GCN with skip connection
DGLBACKEND=mxnet python3 examples/mxnet/gcn/gcn_concat.py --dataset "pubmed" --n-epochs 200 --n-layers 2 --normalization 'sym' --self-loop
# Final accuracy 76.30% with 10-layer GCN with skip connection
DGLBACKEND=mxnet python3 examples/mxnet/gcn/gcn_concat.py --dataset "pubmed" --n-epochs 200 --n-layers 10 --normalization 'sym' --self-loop