项目文件夹

文件
wehub-resource-sync bb5c75ce05
Component Security Validation / Security Audit (push) Has been cancelled
Deploy to Cloudflare Pages / deploy (push) Has been cancelled
chore: import upstream snapshot with attribution
2026-07-13 12:38:58 +08:00

1 行
2.8 KiB
JSON

{"content": "---\nname: requesting-code-review\ndescription: Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements\n---\n\n# Requesting Code Review\n\nDispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade.\n\n**Core principle:** Review early, review often.\n\n## When to Request Review\n\n**Mandatory:**\n- After each task in subagent-driven development\n- After completing major feature\n- Before merge to main\n\n**Optional but valuable:**\n- When stuck (fresh perspective)\n- Before refactoring (baseline check)\n- After fixing complex bug\n\n## How to Request\n\n**1. Get git SHAs:**\n```bash\nBASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) # or origin/main\nHEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)\n```\n\n**2. Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:**\n\nUse Task tool with superpowers:code-reviewer type, fill template at `code-reviewer.md`\n\n**Placeholders:**\n- `{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}` - What you just built\n- `{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS}` - What it should do\n- `{BASE_SHA}` - Starting commit\n- `{HEAD_SHA}` - Ending commit\n- `{DESCRIPTION}` - Brief summary\n\n**3. Act on feedback:**\n- Fix Critical issues immediately\n- Fix Important issues before proceeding\n- Note Minor issues for later\n- Push back if reviewer is wrong (with reasoning)\n\n## Example\n\n```\n[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]\n\nYou: Let me request code review before proceeding.\n\nBASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep \"Task 1\" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')\nHEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)\n\n[Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent]\n WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: Verification and repair functions for conversation index\n PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/plans/deployment-plan.md\n BASE_SHA: a7981ec\n HEAD_SHA: 3df7661\n DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types\n\n[Subagent returns]:\n Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests\n Issues:\n Important: Missing progress indicators\n Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval\n Assessment: Ready to proceed\n\nYou: [Fix progress indicators]\n[Continue to Task 3]\n```\n\n## Integration with Workflows\n\n**Subagent-Driven Development:**\n- Review after EACH task\n- Catch issues before they compound\n- Fix before moving to next task\n\n**Executing Plans:**\n- Review after each batch (3 tasks)\n- Get feedback, apply, continue\n\n**Ad-Hoc Development:**\n- Review before merge\n- Review when stuck\n\n## Red Flags\n\n**Never:**\n- Skip review because \"it's simple\"\n- Ignore Critical issues\n- Proceed with unfixed Important issues\n- Argue with valid technical feedback\n\n**If reviewer wrong:**\n- Push back with technical reasoning\n- Show code/tests that prove it works\n- Request clarification\n\nSee template at: requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md\n"}